To the Editor: Willingness to pay (WTP) is a preference-based method that can be assessed by directly asking patients what amount they would be willing to pay to cure or improve their health condition.1Seidler A.M. Kini S.P. DeLong L.K. Veledar E. Chen S.C. Preference-based measures in dermatology: an overview of utilities and willingness to pay.Dermatol Clin. 2012; 30: 223-229Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar,2Okhovat J.P. Grogan T. Duan L. Goh C. Willingness to pay and quality of life in alopecia areata.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017; 77: 1183-1184Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar This intuitive method directly reflects the impact of the disease on a patient's life, including the psychological aspect, whereas the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) has some drawbacks in that it does not measure a patient's preference or desire for a cure of skin disease.3Poor A.K. Brodszky V. Pentek M. et al.Is the DLQI appropriate for medical decision-making in psoriasis patients?.Arch Dermatol Res. 2018; 310: 47-55Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar There are limited studies on investigating and comparing the WTP and DLQI across a variety of chronic skin diseases. We conducted a multicenter survey involving adult patients who were diagnosed with 7 chronic skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, vitiligo, alopecia areata, rosacea, chronic urticaria (CU), and seborrheic dermatitis in Korea from September 2018 to October 2019 (Table I). To examine WTP, we used a standardized questionnaire validated in previous studies.4Radtke M.A. Schafer I. Gajur A. Langenbruch A. Augustin M. Willingness-to-pay and quality of life in patients with vitiligo.Br J Dermatol. 2009; 161: 134-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar It consists of 2 items: WTP control (how much they would be willing to pay on a monthly basis to control their skin condition) and WTP cure (how much they would be willing to pay as a 1-time cost for an imaginary cure for their skin condition). This study was approved by the ethics committees of the Catholic institutional review boards (XC20RADI0016). Continuous variables were expressed as median and interquartile range. Kruskal-Wallis tests and post hoc Mann-Whitney tests after the Bonferroni correction were used to assess differences in median WTP control and cure between disease groups.Table IClinical characteristics of patients, n (%)CharacteristicsTotalADPsoriasisVitiligoAARosaceaCUSDTotal530 (100)86 (100)60 (100)93 (100)64 (100)72 (100)88 (100)67 (100)Age, y, median (IQR)45 (32-56)30.5 (24-41)45 (34-55)48 (36-61)39.5 (29-51)49.5 (44-58)44.5 (35-56)57 (40-65) 20-39208 (39.3)60 (69.8)23 (38.3)30 (33.3)32 (50.0)12 (16.7)35 (39.8)16 (23.9) 40-59219 (41.3)23 (26.7)29 (48.3)37 (39.8)29 (45.3)45 (62.5)35 (39.8)21 (31.3) ≥60103 (19.4)3 (3.5)8 (13.3)26 (28.0)3 (4.7)15 (20.8)18 (20.5)30 (44.8)Sex Male245 (46.2)37 (43.0)33 (55)36 (38.7)34 (53.1)22 (30.6)38 (43.2)45 (67.2) Female285 (53.8)49 (57.0)27 (45)57 (61.3)30 (46.9)50 (69.4)50 (56.8)22 (32.8)Educational background Elementary school graduate43 (8.1)4 (4.7)4 (6.7)9 (9.7)4 (6.3)8 (11.1)7 (8.0)7 (10.5) Middle school graduate164 (30.9)24 (27.9)24 (40.0)34 (36.6)16 (25.0)20 (27.8)25 (28.4)21 (31.3) High school graduate271 (51.1)49 (57.0)30 (50.0)40 (43.0)35 (54.7)36 (50.0)53 (60.2)28 (41.8) College graduate52 (9.8)9 (10.5)2 (3.3)10 (10.8)9 (14.1)8 (11.1)3 (3.4)11 (16.4)Fitzpatrick skin type II21 (4.0)3 (3.5)4 (6.7)7 (7.5)2 (3.1)1 (1.4)3 (3.4)1 (1.5) III272 (51.3)54 (62.8)32 (53.3)39 (41.9)26 (40.6)33 (45.8)54 (61.4)34 (50.8) IV237 (44.7)29 (33.7)24 (40)47 (50.5)36 (56.3)38 (52.8)31 (35.2)32 (42.8)Disease duration, months, median (IQR)22 (4.3-60)60 (12-129)36 (12-120)24 (4-60)5 (2-12.2)24 (7.8-48)9.5 (3-24)24 (8-60)BSA, % 0.266 (12.5)03 (5.0)19 (20.4)27 (42.2)3 (4.2)3 (3.4)11 (16.4) 0.549 (9.2)01 (1.7)14 (15.1)15 (23.4)11 (15.3)4 (4.6)4 (6.0) 161 (11.5)2 (2.3)3 (5.0)13 (14.0)8 (12.5)18 (25)6 (6.8)11 (16.4) 2106 (20.0)9 (10.5)6 (10.0)19 (20.4)7 (10.9)26 (36.1)7 (8.0)32 (47.8) 577 (14.5)16 (18.6)9 (15.0)11 (11.8)7 (10.9)14 (19.4)14 (15.9)9 (13.4) 1059 (11.1)19 (22.1)16 (26.7)11 (11.8)0011 (12.5)0 2038 (7.2)18 (20.9)8 (13.3)3 (3.2)009 (10.2)0 ≥2074 (14.0)22 (25.6)14 (23.3)3 (3.2)0034 (38.6)0AA, Alopecia areata; AD, atopic dermatitis; BSA, body surface area; CU, chronic urticaria; IQR, interquartile range; SD, seborrheic dermatitis. Open table in a new tab AA, Alopecia areata; AD, atopic dermatitis; BSA, body surface area; CU, chronic urticaria; IQR, interquartile range; SD, seborrheic dermatitis. In total, 617 patients were recruited from 7 hospitals, of whom 530 (85.9%) responded to both the WTP and DLQI questionnaires. The median WTP cure was highest in vitiligo ($2000 for vitiligo, $1000 for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis), and the median WTP control was also highest in vitiligo ($140 for vitiligo and $110 for psoriasis) (Supplemental Table I, available via Mendeley at http://doi.org/10.17632/bhwn5rnybr.1). However, the median DLQI score was highest in patients with AD, followed by psoriasis, CU, rosacea, and vitiligo (Fig 1). Substantial discrepancies between the WTP and DLQI score were seen, reflecting the obvious pitfall of the DLQI questionnaire as a tool to measure the impact of certain skin diseases on a patient's health-related quality of life.5Rencz F. Baji P. Gulacsi L. et al.Discrepancies between the Dermatology Life Quality Index and utility scores.Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 1687-1696Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar Although patients with vitiligo showed the highest WTP cure and control values, their DLQI scores were lower than those of patients with AD, psoriasis, CU, and rosacea. This is possibly because the DLQI is based on questions asking about physical symptoms, such as itch and pain, plus daily activities and personal relationships, but certain diseases, including vitiligo and AA, are rarely associated with skin symptoms.5Rencz F. Baji P. Gulacsi L. et al.Discrepancies between the Dermatology Life Quality Index and utility scores.Qual Life Res. 2016; 25: 1687-1696Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar Possibly, the DLQI would have been more elaborately designed for patients with AD and psoriasis than those with vitiligo and others. Indeed, the DLQI cannot fully evaluate the psychological burden of stigmatization, isolation, and low self-esteem experienced by patients with vitiligo in particular.4Radtke M.A. Schafer I. Gajur A. Langenbruch A. Augustin M. Willingness-to-pay and quality of life in patients with vitiligo.Br J Dermatol. 2009; 161: 134-139Crossref PubMed Scopus (103) Google Scholar Limitation of our study include sampling bias, small sample size, self-administered questionnaire survey, and an inability to compare severity between diseases. In conclusion, WTP would be more appropriate than DLQI in assessing the psychosocial burden of disease, particularly in patients with vitiligo, which is otherwise asymptomatic.